Is Botswana Getting A Raw Deal From De Beers Diamonds - The World News

While the 2025 agreement improved Botswana's diamond sales share to 50% by 2035, the government argues the 15% stake in De Beers remains unbalanced given its 70% supply share. President Duma Boko is now seeking a majority stake in De Beers to secure control over global pricing and branding, with a bid deadline set for April 16, 2026. For more details, visit mining.com Anglo American

For the first time in history, the government of President Mokgweetsi Masisi is publicly saying "yes"—and demanding a divorce settlement that could shatter the cartel forever. While the 2025 agreement improved Botswana's diamond sales

Common points from the article (and similar reports)

• Consider this: A rough diamond dug in Botswana might be cut in Surat, India, polished in Antwerp, set in New York, and sold to a bride in Tokyo. Of that final retail price (which could be 5x to 10x the rough value), Botswana currently captures only the cost of extraction plus half the rough profit. Consider this: A rough diamond dug in Botswana

  The "Sight" Heist

  Critics argue Botswana has already been getting a raw deal for 50 years. They point to the "Sightholder" system—an opaque, invitation-only club where a select few buyers purchase rough diamonds at De Beers-set prices. polished in Antwerp

  The biggest argument for the "raw deal" theory isn't necessarily De Beers' greed, but the timing of the market. Botswana is fighting for a larger share of a natural diamond market that is facing an existential crisis from Lab-Grown Diamonds (LGDs).

  . Historically, the partnership transformed Botswana from one of the world's poorest nations in 1966 into an upper-middle-income country today Key Arguments for a "Raw Deal" Low Share of Sales : For years, Botswana's state-owned Okavango Diamond Company (ODC)

  In 2018, a report by the human rights group, Global Witness, accused De Beers of failing to provide adequate compensation to communities affected by its mining operations. The report also accused the company of using security forces to intimidate and harass local communities.