Confidential Informant List: Indiana

As of April 2026, there is no legitimate public or official "confidential informant list" for the state of

While you cannot simply request a list, a defendant in a criminal case may sometimes force the disclosure of an informant's identity through a motion to reveal identity. confidential informant list indiana

• Brady and Giglio obligations: Prosecutors must disclose to the defense exculpatory evidence (Brady v. Maryland) and impeachment material, including information that could challenge an informant’s credibility or reveal deals that might bias testimony (Giglio v. United States). Failure to disclose can lead to reversal of convictions.
• Work-product and law enforcement privilege: Agencies often assert privilege to protect identities and records to preserve informant safety and effective policing. Courts balance this privilege against the defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial.
• In-camera review and protective orders: To protect informants, judges may review CI lists privately (in camera), redact sensitive details, or issue protective orders limiting disclosure to defense counsel under strict conditions.

In Indiana, several legal mechanisms ensure that lists of confidential informants (CIs) remain out of the public eye: Indiana Code Section 4-2-7-8 As of April 2026, there is no legitimate

If a person is charged with a crime and the informant was a material witness to that specific crime, the judge might force the state to reveal the informant’s identity. This is rare. The defense has to prove they can’t get a fair trial without knowing who the informant is. Brady and Giglio obligations: Prosecutors must disclose to